Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-12 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 2023-05-26 IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-26 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document specifies procedures for representing and verifying the identity of application services in TLS. It obsoletes RFC6125. The document is clear. I just have minor nits-related-questions. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: *Section 6.1: "...a list of acceptable reference identifiers...": acceptable according to whom? Maybe acceptable can be replaced by something like valid/authorized/approved?, e.g. "...a list of valid reference identifiers..."? What do you think? * Section 7.5: "... limiting the number of names that any server can speak for..." Maybe: "..."Limiting the number of names that any server can represent..."? What do you think? * Appendix A: What about to add a sentence such as: ...the title of this document is different from the title of RFC6125 because...? Thanks for this document, Ines. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
