Hi Daniel,
Thanks for addressing my comments. I agree with your suggestions.
BR,
Ines.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:01 AM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ines,
>
> Thanks for the reviews. We can of course include 7227 and I added the
> reference as follows:
>
> This section details the payload of the DHCPv6 options following the
> guidelines of {
> {?RFC7227}}.
>
> Regarding your second comment, I think what we meant is that the trust
> associated with the information obtained via the DHCP option described in
> this document is similar to the trust associated with the IP prefix. I
> think the texte might be clearer saying:
>
> OLD:
> The use of DHCPv6 options provides a similar level of trust as
> the one used to provide the IP prefix
>
> NEW:
> The trust associated with the information carried by the DHCPv6 Options
> described in this document is similar to the one associated with the IP
> prefix - when configured via DHCPv6.
>
> The changes can be seen on github:
>
> https://github.com/ietf-homenet-wg/front-end-naming-delegation-dhc-options/blob/master/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options.md
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:58 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker <
> nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Reviewer: Ines Robles
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-??
>> Reviewer: Ines Robles
>> Review Date: 2022-10-04
>> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04
>> IESG Telechat date: 2022-10-20
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority (HNA)
>> can
>> automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and outsource the
>> authoritative naming service for the home network.
>>
>> The document is well written and easy to understand.
>>
>> I have two minor questions as nits.
>>
>> Major issues: None
>> Minor issues: None
>> Nits/editorial comments/Questions:
>>
>> 1- Have you consider in this document RFC 7227- Guidelines for Creating
>> New
>> DHCPv6 Options -? If yes, should it be added in the references? If not,
>> why
>> not? 2- Page 9: "The use of DHCPv6 options provides a similar level of
>> trust as
>> the one used to provide the IP prefix." In which features are similar? In
>> which
>> features are dissimilar?
>>
>> Thanks for this document,
>>
>> Ines.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> homenet mailing list
>> home...@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
