Dear Stewart,

Thank you for taking the time to review this document.

On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 11:18, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-rsc-10
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2022-08-24
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-08-24
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:A well written document ready for publication
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments: I did spend a bunch of time agonising over
> whether the
> term checklist was used in the normal meaning of the term and in the end
> concluded that it was, but a sentence somewhere setting the reader at ease
> would be useful.



Do you have a specific suggestion?

Kind regards,

Job
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to