Dear John On Tue, 23 Aug 2022, 04:27 John C Klensin, <john-i...@jck.com> wrote:
> > > --On Monday, August 22, 2022 16:01 +0000 "Gould, James" > <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote: > > > John, > > > > How about if we change the approach to use the well-understood > > command-response extension? > > If things were changed to create an extension type that is > defined in RFC 5730 rather than creating a new type, that would > certainly eliminate the need to update 5730 (or explain clearly > why that was not necessary). > > That, of course, leaves the more substantive SMTPUTF8 issues, > particularly the need for a slot for an alternate all-ASCII > address. > No. SMTPUTF8 email address _is_ email address. Otherwise we are stuck with email addresses of first-class and of second-class forever. We don't need separate slot for all-ASCII addresses.
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
