Robert, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.
Lars > On 2021-9-20, at 2:04, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2021-09-19 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-09-22 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC > > Should the IANA registry (and/or the document) say something more about what > one can do if one wanted to represent an Ethernet address? 260 allowed that > but > you are deprecating it - are you only deprecating it for v4 and v6 use, or do > you hope its use goes away completely? > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-c...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
