Hi Roni, As a follow up, I just posted version 05 that reflects the change to address your concern.
Yours, Daniel On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:33 AM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Roni, > > Thanks for the clarification. > > Yours, > Daniel > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:40 AM Roni Even <ron.even....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, >> About the difference between the draft and RFC4303 when reading for the >> first time I thought that section 7 is not the same as 2.8 in RFC4303 about >> integrity only but it was my mistake. So forget this comment. Still you use >> authentication while RFC4303 use integrity but the recommendation is the >> same. >> Roni >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Daniel Migault [mailto:daniel.miga...@ericsson.com] >> > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2021 3:53 AM >> > To: Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org >> > Cc: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp....@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org >> > Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04 >> > >> > Hi Roni, >> > >> > Thanks for the review. We can of course add that RFC4303 is >> authoritative in >> > the main body. I will update the document. >> > >> > I am wondering what differences you have in mind. Of course the >> document are >> > different but I am wondering if there is anything we should clarify. >> > >> > Yours, >> > Daniel >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Roni Even via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> >> > Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 3:58 AM >> > To: gen-art@ietf.org >> > Cc: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp....@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org >> > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04 >> > >> > Reviewer: Roni Even >> > Review result: Ready with Issues >> > >> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review >> > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG >> for the >> > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call >> comments. >> > >> > For more information, please see the FAQ at >> > >> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> > >> > Document: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-?? >> > Reviewer: Roni Even >> > Review Date: 2021-04-02 >> > IETF LC End Date: None >> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> > >> > Summary: >> > This is an early review of the draft. I find the 04 version easy to >> understand but >> > have one comment >> > >> > Major issues: >> > >> > Minor issues: >> > the last paragraph in the abstract , mostly the last sentence " RFC >> 4303 remains >> > the authoritative description." should be in my opinion in the main >> body of the >> > document and not only in the abstract. I also see some difference >> between the >> > document and RFC4303 >> > >> > Nits/editorial comments: >> > >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> l...@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >> > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
