Theresa, thank you for your review and thank you all for the following discussion. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review.
Lars > On 2021-3-18, at 21:51, Theresa Enghardt <i...@tenghardt.net> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Thanks for these changes, they look good to me. > > Best, > Theresa > > > On 3/16/21 2:50 PM, Joseph Touch wrote: >> Hi, Theresa, >> >> FYI - v10 just posted. >> >> Please let me know if this update needs further adjusting. >> >> Joe >> >>> On Mar 15, 2021, at 11:25 PM, Joseph Touch <to...@strayalpha.com >>> <mailto:to...@strayalpha.com>> wrote: >>> >>> FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below: >>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <i...@tenghardt.net >>>> <mailto:i...@tenghardt.net>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> For a better overview, maybe it would help if these discussion >>>>>> points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being discussed, and >>>>>> possibly provided as a list? >>>>> This is a useful idea; we’ll see what we can do in the next update. >>> >>> Upon examination, this doesn’t appear easily possible, as there are >>> different sets of options discussed in each paragraph and the sets overlap. >>> >>> Joe >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
