Vijay, thanks for your review. Balázs, thanks for responding. I entered a No 
Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 8, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Balázs Varga A 
> <balazs.a.varga=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Vijay,
> Many thanks for your review.
> I will fix your nits in the next version. (See inline)
> Thanks
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: detnet <detnet-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:detnet-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
> Behalf Of Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 3:58 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
> Cc: last-c...@ietf.org <mailto:last-c...@ietf.org>; det...@ietf.org 
> <mailto:det...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls....@ietf.org 
> <mailto:draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls....@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Detnet] Genart last call review of 
> draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05
> 
> Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review 
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the 
> IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call 
> comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05
> Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> Review Date: 2021-01-29
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready to be published as a Proposed Standard. 
> 
> Generally, the I-D is quite heavy on acronyms, some of which I suspect comes 
> with the domain the I-D targets.  While I suspect that most readers versed in 
> the area will not have any problems expanding the acronyms, I just wanted to 
> mention this for the authors to perhaps do a once-over to see if any acronyms 
> need expansion.  (I list a couple in the Nits section.)
> 
> Major issues:  0
> 
> Minor issues:  0
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: 2
> 
> - Figure 2: - What is "Tnl"? (Tunnel?)
>            - What does "AC" mean?
> 
> <Balazs> Thanks. Yes Tnl means Tunnel and AC means Attachment Circuit.
> I will update the figure.
> 
> - IDnits is reporting a couple of unused references ([RFC5921] and
>  [RFC8660]), and that draft-ietf-detnet-mpls has been published as
>  RFC 8964.
> 
> <Balazs> Ack. Thanks.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> det...@ietf.org <mailto:det...@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to