Roni, thanks for your review. Ian, thanks for your response. I entered a No 
Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Dec 14, 2020, at 11:45 AM, ianfar...@gmx.com wrote:
> 
> HI Ron,
> 
> Thanks for the review and comments.  Please see inline below.
> 
> Ian
> 
>> On 12. Dec 2020, at 16:44, Roni Even via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements-??
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review Date: 2020-12-12
>> IETF LC End Date: 2020-12-14
>> IESG Telechat date: 2020-12-17
>> 
>> Summary: The document is ready for publication with nits as a standard track 
>> RFC
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 1. first sentence in section  3.5 "If the client loses information about a
>> prefix that it is delegated ..." not clear "it is”
> 
> [if - Suggested reword:
> 
> If the client loses information about an an active prefix lease it has been 
> delegated...
> 
> ]
> 
>> 2. section 7 "This document
>> does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in 
>> Section
>> 22 of [RFC8213]." RFC8213 does not have section 22 , did you mean of RFC8415?
> 
> [if - RFC8213 is correct. The draft has been updated just to reference 
> RFC8213, rather than
> any specific section as the whole document is relevant.]
> 
>> 
>> 3.  In section 7 are there any security requirements for the operational
>> interface requirements from section 4.4?
> 
> [if -  Good point. How about adding a reference recommending that RFC4778 
> (Current Operational Security Practices in             
> Internet Service Provider Environments) is implemented?]
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dh...@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to