Dale, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Sep 30, 2020, at 11:23 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >>> In this case, timely is most about user perception. If the now dysfunctional >>> address remains in use long enough for the user to become annoyed (or >>> arguably >>> even notice), then recovery is not timely. Since the definition of timely in >>> this case is actually subjective, I’m not sure that such clarification is >>> practical or useful. >> >> I agree. But if timliness has no really solid definition, why does the >> text firmly assert that certain particular values, without qualificaton, >> are not timely? > > One can be quite certain that a user will not wait for 3 days for a web page > to load without being certain whether the user will wait 30 seconds, 1 > minute, 3 minutes, or even 1 hour. > > It’s very easy to call 3 days untimely in such a case. It is very hard to > draw a clear line among the lower values. > > Owen > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
