> On 7 Sep 2020, at 16:46, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08 > Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat > Review Date: 2020-09-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-16 > IESG Telechat date: ? > > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > I noticed one nit (typo) in section 7: > > s/ecn-capaable-rtp/ecn-capable-rtp/
Will fix. > Beyond that I have one question/suggestion that I'm happy to have you > consider or ignore as you see fit: > > In the case of missing packets it seems that you have the opportunity to save > some space by encoding a run of contiguous missing packets as a single packet > metric block with L=0, using the remaining bits in the metric block to encode > the number of missing packets. Whether that is an optimization worth the > trouble to do is a question I can't answer. It’s certainly possible to do that, and the WG did discuss optimisations and more complex formats. At present, I think simple and published outweigh optimised. Cheers, Colin -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
