Linda, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Aug 5, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Mike Jones > <Michael.Jones=40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > I agree with Jim's response to the comparison question. > > An RFC is being created because a tag is being registered in the > Specification Required range of the Tags Registry specified at > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049#section-7.2. > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:58 PM > To: 'Linda Dunbar' <linda.dun...@futurewei.com>; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag....@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:38 PM > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag....@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05 > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05 > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2020-08-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-08-14 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > This is a very simple draft, describing how calendar dates are represented, > the same way as common knowledge on how calendar dates are represented. I > am surprised that the draft is "STANDARD track". Why? The only thing > might be that Tag 1004 is Text String, and Tag 100 is a negative integer. > Is it all for a RFC? > > Section 1.3 states that Dates cannot be properly compared unless Time Zone is > attached. Strangely, the Time Zone is not included in the tag 1004 or Tag > 100. > Why? > > [JLS] Linda, This section deals not with comparing Dates with each other, but > comparing Dates with Date/Time Values. This would mean that comparing > 01/01/2020 with 01/01/2020 3:59 PST does not make any sense because one has a > Time Zone and the other does not. > > Jim > > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Best regards, > Linda Dunbar > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
