Hi Francesca, Thanks for the comments, I will make these changes. Regards, Mohit
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:54 AM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Francesca Palombini > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-03 > Reviewer: Francesca Palombini > Review Date: 2020-09-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-02 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that > should be fixed before publication. > > Major issues: - > > Minor issues: - > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Section 1: > OLD: > This extension was > previously defined in section 4.1.1 of [RFC6960] > NEW: > This extension was > previously defined in section 4.4.1 of [RFC6960] > > Section 2: > The message format for the OCSP request and response is defined in > the [RFC6960]. It also defines the standard extensions for OCSP > messages based on the extension model employed in X.509 version 3 > certificates (see [RFC5280]). > > "It" in the second sentence is ambiguous, I think it would be better to > replace > with "[RFC6960]". > > > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > sp...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
