> On May 28, 2020, at 6:27 PM, Robbie Harwood <rharw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> Russ Housley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> writes:
> 
>> Reviewer: Russ Housley
>> Review result: Almost Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
>> the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
>> any other last call comments.
> 
> Hi Russ, thanks for the review.  Changes should be present in -08 unless
> discussed further below.
> 
>> Major Concerns:
>> 
>> Does this align with draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2?
> 
> It's derived from it, though they no longer totally align.
> 
>> Are you aware of https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4018/?
> 
> I have seen it, but as Watson Ladd put it in
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/senXefqczpUZo26B35ekz8d3iLo/
> 
>    I’m not a patent lawyer, and cannot speculate on any IPR conflicts
>    that may or may not exist.

If these documents do not align, then another 3rd party disclosure should be 
made against this document, so the IPR holder can weigh in.

>> Minor Concerns:
>> 
>> Abstract: Please explain "FAST", perhaps just a pointer to RFC 6113.
> 
> We believe this is covered by the "Document conventions" section.

In my opinion, something needs to be in the Abstract.  Otherwise, the Abstract 
is not stand alone.

Russ

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to