Hi Joel, Thanks for the review.
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 18:35, Joel Halpern via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC > > Major issues: > This document says it is Informational. It says it describes "a" capport > architecture. But the third paragraph of the introduction says that this > document standardizes an architecture. The rest of this review assumes > that is an error, and this is describing "an" architecture, rather than > "the IETF" architecture. > You are correct. This is an error. We will address it. > Minor issues: > The abstract really should expand "capport". As simple as having the > first sentence read "This document describes a "captive portal" (capport) > archtiecture." > Makes sense. Thanks > Nits/editorial comments: > Following the first bulleted list in the introduction, the document reads: > "this document does not yet describe...? The word "yet" seems > inappropriate. We are pbulsihgin this as an RFC. Please remove the > "yet". > > > Agreed. We'll remove it. Thanks again for the feedback. I've made sure each item is captured in a github issue so we don't forget to address them. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
