Hi Barry, Thank you for the fast response and addressing the comments.
Have a nice day, Ines. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:13 PM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > Thanks for your review, Ines. Reasonable comments, and we'll consider > them as we go into IESG Evaluation. (On comment 3, I'm just going to > make the necessary change myself, and remove the CREF, so it's moot.) > > Barry > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker > <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Document: draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-01 > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > > Review Date: 2020-04-30 > > IETF LC End Date: 2020-04-30 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > Summary: > > > > This document provides a one-time interpretation of the eligibility > rules (BCP > > 10) that is required for the exceptional situation of the cancellation > of the > > in-person IETF 107 meeting. This document only affects the seating of the > > 2020-2021 NomCom and any rules that relate to NomCom eligibility or > process > > before IETF 108, and does not set a precedent for the future. > > > > The document is clear and well written. Please find some comments below. > > > > Major issues: Not found > > Minor issues: Not found > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > > Some comments/questions: > > > > 1- It would be nice to add a reference here > > > > Section 1: > > > > "...resulting in its conversion to a limited-agenda virtual meeting, > with remote > > participation only.": > > > > e.g. [IETF 107 Virtual] = > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Gqc4-GIsnvccObQrrciL_Vm0HMU/ > > > > 2- Should this clarification be added? > > > > " ...before IETF 108..." --> "...before IETF 108 (virtual or in-person > > meeting)..." e.g. in the introduction or in section 3. > > > > 3- Related to this comment > > [https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kHVPn0tyF5o4Rvd3aZ51JA2MDtU/ > ] > > > > "... In section 2, last paragraph, I suggest changing the CREF to, > "Note: The > > previous two sentences will be replaced before publication with, 'This > document > > contains the outcome of that discussion.'...." > > > > Should this suggestion be applied? > > > > Note that CREF2 mentions "the previous sentence", not "the previous two > > sentences...." > > > > 4- It would be nice to add a reference to eligibility-discuss mailing > list/ > > draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand > > > > Section 3: > > > > "...as there will be time for proper community work on such an update..." > > > > Thus, e.g. "...community work on such an update (e.g. efforts such as > > [Eligibility-discuss-ml] and [Eligibility-criteria])" > > > > [Eligibility-discuss-ml]= > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/ > > [Eligibility-criteria]= > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-eligibility-expand/ > > > > Thank you for this document, > > > > Ines. > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
