Jouni, thanks for your review. Mark, thanks for addressing the comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Mar 9, 2020, at 7:38 PM, Mark Nottingham <m...@mnot.net> wrote: > > Hi Jouni, > > Thanks for the review. Responses below. > >> On 9 Mar 2020, at 7:19 am, Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> >> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >> like any other last call comments. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> >> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-?? >> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen >> Review Date: 2020-03-08 >> IETF LC End Date: 2020-03-12 >> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >> >> Summary: >> This very needed document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC >> with >> few minor nits. >> >> Major issues: >> None. >> >> Minor issues: >> 1) Line 116-117 states "This document uses ABNF [RFC5234], including by >> reference the following rules: ALPHA, DIGIT." Why RFC5234 APLHA and DIGIT >> rules need to be specifically called out? > > Good question; I suspect that's from an earlier revision. Removed. > > >> Nits/editorial comments: >> 1) Line 106 s/ike/like >> 2) Line 106 Expand CSRF on the first use (and possibly give an informative >> reference to it). > > Fixed in source, thanks! > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ <https://www.mnot.net/> > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
