I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-15.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20200311 IETF LC End Date: 20200310 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 3 and 7 page 35: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments (note the word has inconsistent spelling (i.e. US and UK) in the document, I put here the UK spelling, preferring the US one). - 4.3 page 15, 5.3.1 page 27, 6.1.1 page 30, 6.3 page 34: acknowledgement -> acknowledgment - 4.6.2 pages 18 and 19: (e. g. -> (e.g., - 5.1.4 page 24 "Error": e.g. -> e.g., - 6.2.3 page 33: [RFC8261] . -> [RFC8261]. - 10.1 page 36: I suggest to move the I-D normative reference to the end of the list, expecting it will get a greater RFC number... I suggest to run a spell checker with the wanted English variant to track words from the other one. Note these comments are about very small editorial points so you can (should?) consider to leave them to the RFC Editor. Regards francis.dup...@fdupont.fr PS: I looked at the version 16: I have no new comment other the wording about the anti-pattern could be improved. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
