Francis, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for addressing Francis’ comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Sep 26, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-payload-tsvcis-01.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20190918 > IETF LC End Date: 20190925 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - 1.1 page 3: add RFC 8174 with RFC 2119 > > - 3 page 4 figure 1 and many other: if you have some control on page > formatting please try to put short figure on one page, and to not leave > for instance a section title alone at the end of a page. Note that > anyway the RFC Editor should fix that... > > - 3.1 page 5: possible TCVCIS -> TSVCIS? > > - 5 page 16: spurious space / bad indent at > " No SDP negotiations are required." > > - 6 page 16: errored -> ? > > - 9 page 17: the RFC Editor Considerations just says that the RFC Editor > may remove it? Looks like a place-holder... > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art