Dale, thanks for your review. Barry, thanks for your response. Since the comments are all editorial I think you can address them as you see fit. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On May 17, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 3. MYRIGHTS Return Option to LIST Command > > > > The ordering of the responses is significant only in that > > the server MUST NOT send a MYRIGHTS response for a given mailbox > > before it sends the LIST response for that mailbox. > > > > It's clear what this means, but I think the wording is not quite > > correct. > > I don’t understand why you think it’s wrong as it is. I think it’s fine > (well, it’s my text, actually, so of course I do) and don’t see the problem. > While your suggestions are also OK, I don’t think any is better. > > > (In regard to the substance of this constraint, it's not clear to me > > why it exists, but I assume that the authors know of a reason for it.) > > The reason is that the client will be building a data structure of mailboxes, > and it’s possible that clients won’t be able to handle a MYRIGHTS response > when they have not built the mailbox entry from the corresponding LIST > response. Another way to handle this would be to say that clients MUST be > able to do that, it’s very unlikely that a server implementation would want > to send them in the other order anyway, so it’s easier to set the restriction > there. > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
