Stewart, thanks for your reviews. Bhuvan, thanks for addressing Stewart’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:04 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Stewart , > > Thank you reviewing the changes in the revised draft. We apologize for missed > out some of your comments. We will address them as mentioned below in the > newer draft version. > > 1. Regarding your #1 comment, we will add a note to mention that 'OpenFlow > protocol is used as an example to illustrate the methodologies defined in > this document'. Hope this works > 2. We will clarify about the Test Traffic Generators (TP1/2) connectivity in > the setup. We will update such that 'TP1 SHOULD be connected to Network > Device 1 and TP2 SHOULD be connected to Network Device n'. > > Best regards, > Bhuvan > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:18 PM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> > wrote: > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08 > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review Date: 2018-04-16 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-02 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-19 > > Summary: > > This is a well written comprehensive test set for SDN controllers. Two minor > points remain from my previous review that I would draft to the attention of > the responsible AD. > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: > > I found the large amount of text on Openflow that appears out of the blue in > the appendix somewhat strange since the test suit is controller protocol > agnostic. I understand that this is included by way of illustrative example. > It > might be useful to the reader to make a statement to this effect. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > The test traffic > generators TP1 and TP2 SHOULD be connected to the first and the last > leaf Network Device. > > SB> I am sure I know what does first and last mean, but the meaning should be > called out. > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>DISCLAIMER: Privileged and/or > Confidential information may be contained in this message. If you are not the > addressee of this message, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to > anyone. In such event,you should destroy the message and kindly notify the > sender by reply e-mail. It is understood that opinions or conclusions that do > not relate to the official business of the company are neither given nor > endorsed by the company. > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
