Peter, thanks for your review. Henning, thanks for taking the changes into account. I have ballotted no-objection.
Alissa > On Mar 21, 2017, at 11:44 PM, Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com> wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted-04 > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review Date: 2017-03-21 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-21 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This draft specifies a SIP response code for the callee to > indicate that the call is unwanted. It goes to great lengths to > specify what may be done as a result of sending this response code, > all the while mandating nothing. > > The document has a couple of nits, but nothing seriously wrong. > [Ready with nits] > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > > Page 4, 1st full paragraph, 2nd sentence: I can't parse this sentence > as written. It appears to be a list, but then has a clause (starting > at "based on") that doesn't fit neatly in the sequence. Perhaps > inserting "and" before "based" would help. Append "as" after "well". > > Page 5, Section 6, 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence: change "extract" to > "exact". > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
