I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Document: draft-ietf-lisp-crypto-09
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review Date: 2016-10-12
IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-04
IESG Telechat date: 2016-10-13
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC
Though this is not an area of expertise for me, the document is clearly
written, I reviewed the data structures and they appear correct, and the
document seems ready to go forward. (I do find it dicey that this is an
Experimental document. I understand there is history here, but this is a
full-fledged protocol document and the fact that it is only required to
be subjected to a cursory review for Experimental status and can pass
IESG review with one "YES" and everyone else "ABSTAIN"ing seems kinda
ridiculous. But that's not a reason to stop this document.)
Major issues:
None
Minor issues:
None
Nits/editorial comments:
Section 9, second to last paragraph: "Otherwise, the packet has been
tampered with and is discarded." The "tampered with" is probably
overstating the case. I would simply say "invalid".
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
