I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-13 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2016-10-03 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-10 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Almost Ready Major Concerns: I wonder if this ought to be a standards-track document. I recognize that the STRAW WG charter calls for a standards-track document, but it only contains a handfull of MUST statements that are not repeats from another RFC. Maybe this document should become a Best Current Practice (BCP) instead of a standards-track document. Minor Concerns: In Section 3.1, it says: ... It SHOULD NOT, though, forward SDP attributes that may lead to call failures (e.g., candidates, fingerprints, crypto, etc.) for different reasons out of scope to this document. ... This SHOULD NOT statement if a bit vague. The previous sentence lists specific attributes, and I see why that might be difficult to match here, but it does not tell an implementer what attributes to not forward. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
