Hi Dan,
Thank you for your review. Fixes described below have been made to my
working copy and will be included in the next published draft.
Just addressing your first point, as follow-up with Alexey appears to have
clarified the rest.
--On June 21, 2016 at 11:48:14 AM +0000 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
1. Should not this document be marked as 'Updates RFC 5545'? The
document recommends that all properties not defined in 5545 always
include a "VALUE" parameter if the type is other than "TEXT" It also
modifies some existing properties and defines new properties and elements
that bring into the standard extension elements added by vendors into
their specification.
Yes you are right, this does need to "Update" 5545. I will fix that.
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
