On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:54:06PM +0000, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Dan, > > Many thanks for this review! > > You raise two good questions, here’s my take: > I do not have a strong opinion one way or another — I will leave this one to > the AD’s guidance, and I am happy to mark this document as updating RFC 5881 > if that’s the preferred direction. > Indeed — fixed in our working copy.
I'm of mixed opinion to mark it as updating. The bulk of the functionality is separate procedures from RFC 5881. The only thing that is updated is the echo port, which 5881 leaves very much out of scope for what is carried on that port. I agree that it's worth leaving the final call to Álvaro. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
