Thanks for your review, Francis. I see that the CDNI abbreviation has been expanded in a new draft version.
Jari On 07 Oct 2015, at 17:26, Francis Dupont <francis.dup...@fdupont.fr> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20151002 > IETF LC End Date: 20151013 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - In 1 page 2: the CDNI abbrev should be introduced (i.e., the Abstract > is considered as independent). Note that formally CDN and JSON abbrevs > should be introduced too but IMHO it is no necessary here. > > - 2.1 page 3: RFCthis -> this RFC > > - 3.1 page 5: the Nits checker complains the RFC2119 reference is unused. > > BTW I saw the 04 version was published (without problematic changes > rom 03). > > Regards > > francis.dup...@fdupont.fr > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
