Thanks for the review and for spotting these, Tom. I agree… Authors?
Jari On 04 Jul 2015, at 20:58, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Tom Taylor > > Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-text-markdown-use-cases-02 > Reviewer: Tom Taylor > Review Date: 2015/07/04 > IETF LC End Date: 2015/07/03 > IESG Telechat date: 2015/07/09 > > Summary: Well-written. Ready with nits. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > > IDNits reports five instances of control characters in the document. Good > luck finding them! > > IDNits reports a number of missing and unused references. > > Sec. 1.1, second para, second-last line: > s/bit are corrupted/bit is corrupted/ > > Sec. 1.3: There seem to be a few missing references, where [CITE] is used as > a stand-in. Also see [NB: CITE?] later in that section. > > Sec. 2.7.2: RFC 2119 SHOULD is used, but the usual invocation of RFC 2119 > language at the start of the document is missing. The next section (re GIT) > uses lower-case "should", and that is probably your best way forward. > Actually, IDNits (now that I check) reports a number of other instances of > RFC 2119 capitalization, so you'll have to decide what is appropriate. > > Sec. 4.1: s/# MutliMarkdown Example #/# MultiMarkdown Example #/ > > Sec. 4.2 (beginning has this: > ~~Oops this is some mistaken text.~~ > Is that example markdown or a comment on something that has to be fixed? >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
