I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document:                         draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-07.txt

Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg

Review Date:                     5 February 2015

IETF LC End Date:             17 February 2015

IETF Telechat Date:         N/A

Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. 
However, I do have some editorial comments, which I request to authors to 
address.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Editorial nits: See below


General:

QGEN_1:

Throughout the document, the uses both "The Opus coded", "The Opus speech and 
audio codec" and "Opus" terminology.

I suggest to use consistent terminology.

For example, if you choose to use "Opus", the first sentence in the 
Introduction would say:

              "Opus is a speech and audio codec..."

-------------

Section 1:

Q1_1:

In the first sentence, I suggest to add a reference after the first occurrence 
of "Opus":

"The Opus codec is a..." -> "The Opus codec [RFC6716] is a..."

...or, if you choose to use "Opus" (see QGEN_1):

              "Opus [RFC6716] is a..."

In addition, I suggest to remove the last sentence ("More information on...") 
of the section.

-------------

Section 3:

Q3_1:

If you add a reference to Opus in section 1 (see Q1_1), it is not needed here.


Q3_2:

I assume the last sentence should say "...transmitting OF stereo signals."?

-------------

Section 3.1:

Q3-1_1:

The last sentence says "...result in higher quality.".

I assume the text refers to audio/speech quality? Would it be useful to 
explicitly say so?

The same comment applies to "quality" in section 3.1.2.

-------------

Section 6.2:

Q6-2_1: I suggest a new "SDP Considerations" level 1 section, and then to place 
current section 6.2 below that.

-------------

Section 6.2.1:

Q6-2-1_1: I suggest to rename the section to "SDP Offer/Answer Considerations".

Q6-2-1_2: The section does not define whether/if/how a certain parameter value 
in an answer is based on the corresponding parameter value in the associated 
offer.


Regards.

Christer






_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to