Thanks for your review, Roni! Jari
On 23 Oct 2014, at 15:46, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08 > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2014–10-23 > IETF LC End Date: 2014–10-30 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC. > > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Section 2.3 discusses the issue of defining appropriate registration policy. > I was wondering about consistency between the policies of similar registries, > is it important and how to verify it. For example the policy for > http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-security-descriptions/sdp-security-descriptions.xhtml#sdp-security-descriptions-3 > is standard action and for > http://www.iana.org/assignments/srtp-protection/srtp-protection.xhtml#srtp-protection-1 > is specification required. I think that such cases should be discussed when > defining the registration policy. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > In section 2.3 “judgement” should be “judgment” > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
