On Oct 6, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Xing Li <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the decision of the WG and moves forward in Softwire Interim Meeting > in Beijing, Sept, 2011. > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/current/msg02631.html We may > add some historical background in the next version.
I don't think this is necessary. I believe this document is in charter because it is just using NAT64 in a new way, not defining a new translation mechanism. The message you quoted doesn't really address the issue; I suspect this was discussed with Ralph back then, but I think we are okay. However, it's possible that the IESG will want to explore the issue further; worst case, we recharter. I don't think this needs to be addressed in the document. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
