OK > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 23 April, 2014 7:17 PM > To: Roni Even > Cc: [email protected] Review Team; The IESG; draft-housley-pkix- > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-housley-pkix-oids-00 > > Roni: > > Thanks for catching this error. I will post -03 to correct it. I will also take this > opportunity to add a sentence to the security considerations. > > Russ > > > On Apr 23, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > > Thanks for your review, Roni. But, there was no e-mail response. Russ > happens to be sitting next to me and he's checking whether he has dealt with > this. > > > > Jari > > > > On Feb 18, 2014, at 6:14 AM, Roni Even <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- > ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > >> > >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > >> > >> Document: draft-housley-pkix-oids-00 > >> Reviewer: Roni Even > >> Review Date:2014-2-18 > >> IETF LC End Date: 2014-2-28 > >> IESG Telechat date: > >> > >> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > >> > >> > >> Major issues: > >> > >> Minor issues: > >> > >> > >> Nits/editorial comments: > >> > >> In section 3.26 first entry I noticed when comparing to RFC5055 section > 3.2.4.2.4 that the description in RFC5055 is id-nvae-name-mismatch. It caused > me a problem when trying to find it in RFC5055, the values are correct so may > not be important (maybe to ASN.1 compiler?) I did not check all the > descriptions but I looked at RFC 5055 to understand the registration. (BTW: all > the names in this table are not the same)
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
