I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest-09 Reviewer: Peter McCann Review Date: 2013-03-27 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2013-03-28 Summary: Ready Major issues: none Minor issues: e.g. at a RTCP transcoder Did you mean "at an RTP transcoder"? Nits/editorial comments: Section 2.3: useful as the the IETF SHOULD BE: useful as the IETF References: [I-D.ietf-avtcore-ecn-for-rtp] Change to: RFC 6679 (nb: I assume the authors have been in communication with the 6679 authors and that the two documents are in agreement) Section 4.1.1: give a at least one SHOULD BE: give at least one _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
