Hi Roni,
Thanks. Will do the edit you pointed out.

Thanks,
Nbail

From: Roni Even <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:46 AM
To: 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04
Resent-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"<, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>", 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ancp-pon-04

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2013–2–12

IETF LC End Date: 2013-2–19

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.





Major issues:



Minor issues:




Nits/editorial comments:

 1.  OMCI is expanded very late in the document and not on the first usage.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to