On 10/19/2012 8:15 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your review.
Yes, thank you.
On 16/10/2012 22:48, Martin Thomson wrote:
Nits:
+der doesn't even make a passing reference to +ber. That's odd, since
one describes a subset of the other.
It might be worth adding a sentence on this.
I originally had the two in the same section with a common description
and subsections for the registration forms, making it very obvious that
they were related. I got comments to separate them out an dpull them
both up to top level.
You can still tell that they are related by the fact that they use the
same reference, but do we really need any additional text? My
inclination is to not add anything further.
Tony
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
