Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the review.
>- About the SDP example in Section 3.1. The first paragraph reads:
>
> The SDP description below states that the source flow defined
> by the tuple {*,*,233.252.0.1,30000} is identified with FID=0 and the
> source flow defined by the tuple {*,*,233.252.0.2,30000} is
> identified with FID=1.
>
>
>However, the example shows flows does not show any flow with any token
>named "FID". I don't know if the text is trying to refer to the "mid"
>attribute, in which case the values are S1 and S2, respectively. Or the
>text is trying to refer to the "id" parameter of the "fec-source-flow"
>attribute. The text should not leave this interpretation to the reader.
It is the id parameter. I added text for this.
>- Figure 7 and 8. Do the captions need to indicate that these are "for
>IPv4", for example, in Figure 7: "Example of a source packet for IPv4"
Good idea.
>
>- idnits reveals that draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling ha sbeen
>published as RFC 6695.
Will replace it.
-acbegen
>
>/Miguel
>--
>Miguel A. Garcia
>+34-91-339-3608
>Ericsson Spain
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
