I have removed all but one of your comments below. This comment had not yet been addressed. With this reply I believe I have addressed all of your comments. If you find that I have missed one please let me know.
-- dan On May 3, 2011, at 2:39 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote: > > - Section 13.1.6 describes a mechanism where vendor-specific extensions use > the reverse DNS mechanism, for example., "com.example.foo". Then, if the > vendor-specific extension is connected to DNS to avoid clashes in names, why > is there a need for an expert review policy prior to its registration? I see > a contradiction in having a self-managing registry by avoiding clashes due to > the connection to DNS, and then having anything else than a volunteer > registry. > In the next draft I will replace "Expert Review" with "First Come First Served". _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
