This review is more than a year old. Could you take a quick look? Draft -23 is on the agenda for Thursday.
Russ On Jun 16, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-21.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 2010-06-14 > IETF LC End Date: 2010-06-14 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - ToC page 3 and 6 page 27: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 1 page 4: the DUT abbrev should be introduced at the first use > > - 2 page 4: IMHO you should expand the BMWG abbrev > > - 3.5.1 page 13: minimum and maximum number -> numbers? > > - 3.5.1 page 13: expand the ECMP abbrev? > > - 3.7.2 page 23: I don't like the packet loss meusurement unit, > i.e., IMHO it should be (simply) packets > > - 3.7.7 page 25: e.g. -> e.g., > > Thanks > > [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
