Simon Perreault wrote:
On 04/08/2011 05:45 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Major issue:
- The document is listed as Standards Track but but does not contain the
RFC 2119 boilerplate. There is some RFC 2119 terminology used, however,
there seems to be a lot of cases where RFC 2119 language is appropriate
but not used.
Right. This was mentioned to me before.
Indeed.
The next revision will fix that.
Minor issue:
- The document doesn't pass idnits - the error appears to be an old
reference to the IETF trust provisions.
The next revision will fix that.
- I'm assuming an XML expert has reviewed the schema, however, there is
no Write-up in the History stating such.
The writeup is being worked on...
And the schema is being verified...
Alexey,
as the document shepherd.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
