On 2011-04-09 08:03, [email protected] wrote:
> The last is not a Gen-ART, but was put
> there for adding considerations to the security section. I just
> meant that it should state that there may be privacy concerns with
> some of the information. I listed the regulations to give examples,
> but not to have them entered into the document. You mention the use
> of encryption for protection against spoofing, it would also be used
> for confidentiality in protecting privacy of the information.
I misunderstood your previous comment. I understand now. Sorry about
that. How about the following:
o vCards often carry information that can be sensitive (e.g.
birthday, address, and phone information). Although they have no
inherent authentication or privacy, they can easily be carried by
any security mechanism that transfers MIME objects with
authentication or privacy (e.g. S/MIME [RFC5751], OpenPGP
[RFC4880]). In cases where the privacy or authenticity of
information contained in vCard is a concern, the vCard SHOULD be
transported using one of these secure mechanisms. The KEY
property (Section 6.8.1) can be used to transport the public key
used by these mechanisms.
Thanks,
Simon
--
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
