> From: Wassim Haddad <[email protected]> > Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT > To: Gen-art <[email protected]> > Cc: Wassim Haddad <[email protected]>, > "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For > background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01 > Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA > Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad > Review Date: 16-March-2011 > IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011 > IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011 > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it > would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item > > - Major issue: none > - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific > directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". > The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in > this context. > > idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved > Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA. > > > Regards, > > Wassim H. > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
