I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-meadors-multiple-attachments-ediint-10 Reviewer: Peter McCann Review Date: 2011-02-25 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2011-03-03 Summary: Ready, one question Major issues: Minor issues: The MIC and signature algorithms seem to duplicate some of what S/MIME does. Is there a reason S/MIME couldn't have been used? Nits/editorial comments: Abstract: message were designed SHOULD BE: messages were designed Section 2.2: To indicate support for MA, MA should be expanded on first use. Section 2.3: MIC should be expanded on first use. (Assume this is "Message Integrity Check") Section 2.5: envelop SHOULD BE: envelope _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
