Thanks for the review.
On Mar 26, 2009, at 12:34 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-p2pi-cooper-workshop-report-01.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Summary: This draft is well written and easy to read. I cannot
comment much on the contents of the draft since it is just reporting
events that occurred at a workshop. I think the draft is ready for
publication as Informational RFC.
Meta comment
============
I think this document should be Informational and not Standards
track as stated in the draft.
Yes, this was a slip up with xml2rfc. It is going forward as
Informational and I inserted an RFC Ed note to make sure this did not
get lost.
Editorial comments
==================
Thanks - I have put in an RFC Ed note for all three of these.
* Page 4:
s/properietary/proprietary/
s/seperate/separate/
* Page 8:
AQM is undefined. Did you mean QAM? Either way please expand at
first use.
Adaptive Queue Management was meant here. I will put in a note to
expand that as you suggested.
* References
The reference with anchor [RFC2474] points to RFC2475. Please fix it
to read RFC2474.
Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
