Nico,
The paragraph is identical in the -05 and -06 drafts,
so no, actually you didn't change anything after my review.
I still find the text a little unclear.
I don't feel strongly about this; Russ has just logged it
as a comment, so it's up to you and Tim whether to change
anything.
Brian
On 2009-04-07 03:42, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:35:23AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:30:21AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> Summary: Almost ready; needs one clarification.
>>>
>>> Comments:
>>>
>>> I was expecting the sentence quoted below to be updated
>>> following Nico's comments on my Last Call comment. I think the new
>>> text would be
>>>
>>> Where the language binding of the GSS-API model's channel bindings is
>>> as
>>> single OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the
>>> implementation
>>> SHOULD assume that the given bindings correspond only to the
>>> application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above.
>> Oops, sorry I missed that edit. I'll submit a revised I-D shortly --
>> I'll s/is as/is as a/.
>
> Er, no, I did update that. I replaced the above with:
>
> Where a language binding of the GSS-API models channel bindings as
> OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the implementation
> MUST assume that the given bindings correspond only to the
> application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above, rather
> than some encoding of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS.
>
> I think that's clearer.
>
> Nico
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
