Thanks for the quick response!
I think that the changes you propose will address my comments.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Dec 10, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Junghoon Jee wrote:
Dear Ben Campbell,
Thank you for carefully reviewing the draft.
Please find inline replies.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General Area Review Team" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
networks.com>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 2:31 AM
Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-16ng-ps-goals-03
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 10 December 2007
IETF LC End Date: 10 December 2007
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary:
This document is almost ready for publication as an informational
RFC.
There are some editorial nits that should be addressed prior to
publication.
Comments:
General: There are many occurrences of missing articles ("a", "an",
or
"the") or the occasional use of an article where it does not belong.
While I assume that the RFC editors will fix these, it would same
them
some work if you did an additional proofreading pass for this sort of
thing.
Yes, additional proofreading will be done ASAP and the next revision
will apply the correction.
Terminology Section, Definition of "Ethernet CS":
It would be helpful to have a reference for 802.16 STD.
That part will be amended that part like below:
Ethernet CS: It means 802.3/Ethernet CS specific part of the Packet
CS defined in [IEEE802.16].
IP CS terminology will also reference [IEEE802.16].
Section 4.1, paragraph 7: "In the first point-to-point link model..."
I think you mean to refer to the first model in the preceding list,
which is the point-to-point link model. The wording sounds like you
mean the first of a set of point-to-point link models, which is
incorrect. I suggest just dropping the word "first".
Right!
Let me drop that word.
A similar issue occurs in paragraph 9 ("In the second Ethernet like
link model...") and 11 ("The last shared IPv6 prefix link model")
Let me drop the 'second' and 'last' in them.
Section 4.1, paragraph 9: "There needs mechanisms ..."
It looks like some words are missing from this sentence.
Let me try to apply the following change:
- From: There needs mechanisms like IEEE 802.1D to realize multicast
and broadcast for Ethernet CS.
- To: Therefore, we need a mechanism like 802.1D to realize
multicast and broadcast.
Section 4.1, paragraph 10, starting with "Moreover, the frequent IP
multicast..."
I had trouble parsing this paragraph in general. Also, Is "IP subnet
like ethernet" the same as "Ethernet like link model"?
Let me try to apply the following change:
- From: Moreover, the frequent IP multicast and broadcast signaling
within the IP subnet like Ethernet needs to be avoided not to wake
up sleep/idle [IEEE802.16e] SSs.
- To: Moreover, the frequent IP multicast and broadcast signaling
should be avoided not to wake up sleep/idle [IEEE802.16e] SSs.
Section 4.1, last paragraph:
"According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the Point-
to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model for IP CS under
considering the multilink subnet problems. "
I cannot parse this sentence--please rephrase.
Let me try to apply the following change:
- From: According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the
Point-to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model for IP CS
under considering the multilink subnet problems.
- To: According to the point-to-point feature of 802.16's MAC, the
Point-to-Point link model is the feasible IP Subnet model in case of
the IP CS.
Thanks!
Ben Campbell.
Best Regards,
Junghoon
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
