On Oct 17, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
On 16 Oct 2007 at 20:53 -0500, Mary Barnes allegedly wrote:
[MB] We did debate this in the WG as someone else had the same
suggestion as yourself. But, it was agreed that the original
deliverable was defined to be standards track, so we kept it that
way.
[/MB]
I figured as much.
I've asked them to keep it standards track. My worry is that the
protocol document will need to normatively reference the framework
because this does have a lot of structure about how things fit
together in it. I don't want to end up repeating the Midcom
experience with the normative/informative reference to the framework.
Cullen <with my AD hat on>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
