These are non binding comments, so, you should wait for instructions
from your AD. Or if you receive enough substantial comments during the
IETF LC, you can consider these comments as well.
/Miguel
Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Thank you.
Miguel Garcia writes:
Document: draft-siemborski-imap-sasl-initial-response-06.txt
...
Comments: Just a couple of nits
1) Section 3, 4th paragraph. The paragraph is a "Note", however, it
contains normative text (MUST, MUST NOT). Although this is not a rule,
in general notes should not contain normative text, but just
clarifications and motivations to the text. I would suggest to make
the Note with only the first sentence of the paragraph and start a new
paragraph with "Servers which implement this extension MUST ..."
OK.
2) Section 5, IANA. The text should identify with precision the
registry IANA has to operate. This registry is called "IMAP4
Capabilities Registry" rather than "IMAP extensions". Source:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities
OK.
I'll do these with RFC Editor notes, unless something bigger turns up
and requires a new revision.
Arnt
--
Miguel A. Garcia tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center Helsinki, Finland
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
