Hello Eric
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:09:30 -0500, "Eric Gray \(LO/EUS\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Stig,
> These should be considered in the same vein as any other
> Last Call comments, you might receive. In particular, you may
> want to note that I did not post these on the PIM mailing list.
> You may wish to include them - with others - in separate mail
> to the mailing list, or you may want me to re-post them to the
> PIM mailing list.
> I do not usually post them on the working group mailing
> list if I am not a subscriber to that list as it often turns
> out that people assume that - because I made last call comments
> - they can respond to them on the list and I'll see them there.
> I struggled with these comments however as it is fairly
> clear that they may be thought both substantive and contentious.
> If you (authors) choose to discuss these comments on the PIM
> list, that's fine with me as long as nobody is expecting me to
> respond to them unless I am explicitly copied on them. If you
> would prefer me to re-post these to the PIM mailing list, I can
> do so ("the authors asked me to repost these Last Call comments
> on this list, please explicitly copy me on any responses you'd
> like me to address, etcetera, etc.").
Yes, I think the issues you've raised should be discussed on the
mailing list. I'd be grateful if you could repost them there.
Thanks,
--
Alex
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
