Hi Miguel, Thanks for the review.
Miguel Garcia wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mip4-mobike-connectivity-02.txt Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Review Date: 2007-01-28 IETF LC End Date: 2007-02-06. Summary: The draft is ready for publication as a BCP. Comments: - idnits reflects a couple of nits that should be solved.
I found some experimental warnings. Experimental warnings: - Missing Reference: 'R' is mentioned on line 223, but not defined - Missing Reference: 'DHCP' is mentioned on line 223, but not defined But it picked these from Figure 1. I used [R] for a router and [DHCP] to say that DHCP is used on the link to acquire an address. idnits assumed these to be references.
- The third line of the draft indicates that the intended status is "Standards Track", however, the information I got from the Gen-ART team is that the intended status of this draft is BCP. Just clarify, the RFC Editor may also get confused with these two opposite pieces of information.
Fixed this. The intended status is BCP.
- Section 2: the first and the last paragraphs in this section are the same. One of them should be deleted.
Fixed. Vijay _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
