On 11/04/2005 18:29 PM, Spencer Dawkins allegedly wrote:
> Dear Gen-ART,
> 
> I asked Brian about a Gen-ART FAQ and Brian demonstrated his IETF
> prowess by getting me to send text without actually saying, "Send text".
> No wonder he's the General Area director...
> 
> Anyway - Brian and Mary have seen this and given a couple of suggestions
> apiece, and Brian asked me to send it to the group for comments, so...
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Spencer
> 
> Q: What is Gen-ART?
> A: The General Area Review Team. They provide gneralist reviews for the
> General Area director (currently Brian Carpenter), providing an additional

delete Brian, maybe say currently IETF chair

> set of eyes for documents as they are being considered for publication.
> 
> Q: Who is Gen-ART?
> A: The current membership list is maintained at
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/reviewer-list.html. We do accept
> new reviewers - volunteers should contact the Gen-ART secretary (see
> below) < NOTE that this phrasing is Brian's, but the URL actually says
> "contact the General Area director" - we just need to say the same thing
> in both places>

fix the URL; if needed the General Area director can get secretary mail

> 
> Q: What does the Gen-ART secretary do and how do I find him/her?
> A: The Gen-ART secretary is also listed on the membership page. The
> Gen-ART secretary tracks documents submitted for publication and assigns
> them to reviewers, and collects the reviews, posting them to
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html.
> 
> Q: Why is my document being reviewed?
> A: Two possible answers - most Gen-ART reviews are now assigned at IETF
> Last
> Call time (answer #1). If a document is revised after IETF Last Call, or is
> processed so quickly that no Gen-ART reviewer has been assigned, it's
> reviewed after being placed on the IESG Telechat agenda (answer #2).
> 
> Q: How was my Gen-ART reviewer selected?
> A: There is a mechanism, but it's more about leveling the review workload
> than selecting reviewers based on topic areas. Gen-ART reviewers are
> generalists, so we think this is OK.

More than that.  We intentionally avoid specialization.

> 
> Q: Are the reviews public or private?
> A: The reviews are sent to the Gen-ART mailing list (which includes the
> General Area director). Ordinarily, copies are sent to shepherding ADs,
> document shepherds, working group chairs, and authors/editors, but the
> archives are publically viewable, at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/index.html.
> 
> Q: Are Gen-ART comments binding?
> A: Not unless the General Area director agrees with the comments. Gen-ART
> does not have a formal role in the standards approval process - we're
> simply
> providing input for the General Area director who is deciding how to ballot
> the document. If the General Area director agrees with a serious concern
> expressed in a Gen-ART review, the General Area director may ask the
> Gen-ART
> reviewer, "does the new version of the draft address your concerns?"
> 
> Q: I have comments from a Gen-ART reviewer - do I revise the document
> immediately?
> A: Ask your AD/document shepherd. Practice varies between areas. A fair
> number of comments area resolved with Notes to the RFC Editor. But the
> General Area director will not ask for a respin before a telechat.
> 
> Q: What if the Gen-ART reviewer is just flat wrong?
> A: The General Area director understands that these are reviews by
> generalists who are not experts in every protocol the IETF works on, plus
> security and MIBs. If you disagree with comments, say so. The ballot
> position is called "DISCUSS", not "IMPERIAL EDICT" or "BLACKMAIL".

The gen-art reviewers *want* to hear feedback.  They want to learn
more about your area, and want feedback about how helpful their
comments are.

> 
> Q: Is there any written Gen-ART procedure?
> A: Currently
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-doria-genart-experience-01.txt,
> and - guess what - we're still reviewing it :-)

Scott

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to